I have to admit that reading that article about Mathew
Shepard was a real eye opener. My initial reaction to reading about his story
was more positive than it should have been; I felt like it was a good story of
justice being served. Justice was indeed served to Shepard’s murderers but as
the authors of this article, Aoki, and Ott, point out, the media used Shepard’s
case as a story of two “monsters” preying on an “innocent victim.” This angle on
the story helps us sympathize with Shepard but it averts our attention from
larger social implications of the murder. Instead of facing the fact that much
of our society is still intolerant of homosexuals the news media helped the
public view the crime as a despicable act by low intelligent hicks, the news
media played this up to be a tragic event that society is not held responsible
for. The reason for this comes from humanity’s need to cope with the world
around them through storytelling.
Human beings are storytellers by nature; ancient humans used
the constellations to tell stories, humans pass down stories of myths and urban
legends for centuries, a group of friends might reminisce on old “stories” that
happened in their younger days, and one of the most popular forms of
entertainment for people for the past one hundred years is going to the movies
to see a story onscreen. It only makes sense that our news be delivered to us
in form of a narrative because that’s what we’re most comfortable with. Maybe we
need to evolve as a species beyond the need for narratives to make sense of our
world so we can focus on making the world a better place to live for everyone.
No comments:
Post a Comment