We hate hipsters because they are jerks right? Because they
have caused unimaginable damages? We are supposed to gang up on them and get
rid of them because they are everything that is wrong with our society.
Correct? No. For the purpose of this post, I am using this definition of
hipster because I know there are plenty out there.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hipster&defid=2705928
Going off
the class's opinion of hipsters, it sounded like we didn't really enjoy how
these people contribute to society. It sounded, to me, as if we should hate
hipsters because of how they dress or how they feel about their clothes. Of
course they think they're different. They are different which, to me, doesn't
sound too bad so, when an entire class decides that these people shouldn't be
around, I start to think I'm missing something.
Upon further research I have
gathered that we are to hate "bandwagon hipsters". These are people
that think they're different even though they shop name brand clothing stores
and mainstream lines, and, for this reason, we should hate them. I'm still lost
in this argument. I know plenty of my friends shop name brand clothing because
it makes them feel part of a certain crowd. I don't see how this is any
different. I believe we all attempt to make some kind of statement with our
apparel and these bandwagon hipsters are no different.
I believe the real issue with hipsters is not an
issue with hipsters at all. It is an issue with us as a society. If this
problem with hipsters is correct, then we have found something to hate that
isn't worth hating, and while we continue to bash these people for their
clothing options, there are genuine jerks that feel fine because they aren't "hipsters".
I guess the point to my argument is that we shouldn't care what the person is
wearing, but we should focus on the people wearing it. It sounds pretty
elementary to me, but apparently this still needs to be taught on a college
campus.
No comments:
Post a Comment