I am totally in line with Professor McCauliff when it comes
to video games- I don’t know much about them, nor do I care much about them. I
feel like I gained some insight to them through our readings in class.
Growing up,
my mother never allowed my sister and I to own a gaming system. She always
thought that kids who own them don’t do anything else but play video games. She
easily got this idea through my cousins, who did little but playing video games
when we were kids. They were addicted. Because of this biased exposure, I have
never been too keen on video games. The articles we read and the TED talked
viewed in class offered a view I wasn’t used to receiving: video games can and
are helpful to society.
The TED
talk we watched completely took me by surprise. I never thought that the claim
would be made that in order for the young leaders of our new world to prosper,
more video games must be played. Not sure I agree here. I understand the theory
that video games can help foster problem-solving skills and can help one master
a quick reaction time. I simply think
the claim that was made was a bit extreme. I do not think it makes sense to
prepare for real life scenarios by playing in a virtual world. I think the main
component that prepares doctors, scientists, lawyers and various other
occupations is real-world training. A doctor should shadow others in a hospital,
and a scientist should spend many hours in lab. Video games just don’t seem
like the answer to me. It may help as a supplemental tool, but I do not believe
our society needs to play any more than it already does.
No comments:
Post a Comment