The topic of Caster Semenya is a tough one. Everyone has
their opinions on whether she was male or female and if it was fair for her to compete
in the women’s middle-distance running event in the 2012 Olympics held in London. It is unfortunate
that due to her athletic performance and physical characteristics that she was
questioned to be a man. This just shows how our society associates certain
physical characteristics with a certain sex and if you aren’t “normal” ,
meaning you display characteristics of what your sex “should” display, then you’re
questionable. Because her voice was deep, it was possible that she was a man.
Because her athletic abilities exceeded the performance of the other ladies,
she could be a man. Because her hair was pulled back and she has very defined
muscles, she was possibly a man. But why do these physical characteristics HAVE
to be associated with a male? Why couldn’t she be strong? Who says she has to
have a high-pitched voice? And everyone doesn’t care to have their hair down. I
feel that they questioned her sexuality without fair reason because had the
physical characteristics of Semenya matched that of what a woman “should” look
like, her sexuality may have never been questioned. As one of her fellow
competitors I could understand maybe questioning her athletic abilities. She
did win by a pretty large stretch. And I could even see people questioning maybe
if some steroid use was involved, which in reality sucks. Why can’t she just be
really good at something and recognized for it? But that’s not how society
works. So drug testing would have been one thing, but to question her sexuality
I believe was completely unjust and displays how sexist our society is as a
whole.
No comments:
Post a Comment