I re-watched the first Shrek movie recently and I had
forgotten about what a clever parody of fairy tales it is. After reading the
articles about “Princess culture” I started realizing that Shrek is a great
subversion to the idea that ultra-femininity, being superior to others, and
materialism, i.e. being a princess, will bring a girl happiness. In Shrek, the
main female character, Princess Fiona, is a legitimate princess to be sure; she
wears a crown, believes she’s in charge (for a while at least) and has the idea
that she will be happy when she marries her “perfect prince.” This is
contrasted by the fact that she never plays the damsel in distress (she’s a
martial arts expert), she can belch on cue, and, oh yeah, she turns into an
ugly ogre at night. In the end she realizes she, as well as Shrek, let go of
their skewed ideas about what will make them happy and fall-in-love-and-happily-ever-
you know the ending. That movie shows what no Disney movie ever does; you don’t
need to be a princess to be happy.
I also thought of the movie Tangled as I was reading those articles. That movie also subverts fairy
tale tropes for comic effect like Shrek. It is a Disney movie but the princess,
unlike most Disney princesses, does not have an overly sexualized body. In
fact, she is small and skinny as compared to the voluptuous and curved Jasmine
from Aladdin or Meg from Hercules. Instead of emphasizing her body, the
animators chose to emphasize her face, which gives a character more of an
identity rather than just being the prize for the male lead to win. If Disney
continues to make princess movies I hope they are done similar to Tangled.
No comments:
Post a Comment